Update: Remuda Estates HOA vs Russells Case
ByI’m sad to say that we have little for updates at this time. The December 1, 2011 postponement date has clearly passed with all evidence being submitted by the parties’ attorneys on that date for review by Justice of the Peace Lynn Marie Johnson. Currently there still has been no known verdict received by the Russell couple or their attorney.
Profile photo of JP Lynn Marie Johnson
Interesting note: Claire Russell was scheduled to speak at a Parker County Tea Party meeting last night when, to their surprise, Judge Johnson showed up at the meeting with a City Counsel member at her side. After communications with several members of the group last night, nobody is quite sure why Johnson decided to attend her first Parker County Tea Party meeting last night, December 6, 2011. I was told that she had previously, before the Russell case, been given an open invitation to attend a meeting. Members treated her with respect and she did the same during this meeting of the Parker County Tea Party. I will make mention that the issues with this Remuda Estates HOA began long before Judge Johnson took the seat in the Parker County Pct. 4 courtroom.
An interesting comment, by one of the groups members, made regarding the Judge’s attendance last night,
“Well maybe Judge Johnson learned something about the Constitution and what we stand for by being there last night, she certainly hasn’t silenced anyone.”
Because of Judge Johnson’s being in attendance, Claire Russell’s attorney, Joshua Carden, advised her to postpone her speaking engagement in an effort to prevent any potential legal repercussions with regards to their current ongoing case to which they have yet to receive judgement on their bond hearing.
Since my last update on this issue, I’ve since learned that Real Estate Agencies have been refusing to list homes from the Remuda Ranch Estates. According to residents of the HOA, this issue dates back to a time previous to the Russell’s case being aired.
I would also like to recommend your reading the continued debates that are still taking place in the comments section of a previous story that takes a deeper look into the board members of the Remuda HOA.
Other stories of interest:
- Update on Russells – Judge Overrules Johnson’s JP Court Judgement
- Herring Resigns from HOA Board Over Remuda HOA vs Russells Lawsuit
- Looking into the Board Members (Bullies) of the Remuda Ranch Estates Homeowners Association (Update)
- Taking a Better Look into Conflicts of Interest in Parker County, Texas Regarding Russell Case
- Conflict of Interest Causing an Uprising in Parker County, Texas over Homeowners being Sued (Update #1)
By clicking the tip jar to the right to the right you can help to keep this site alive.
The Russell’s attorney was correct in telling them that speaking at the event with the judge there could be a legal problem. I do hope with the Judge’s first attendance of a tea party meeting she will learn how important freedom of speech is.
At the tea party meetings, we do treat all with respect. We may be both republicans and democrats, but unlike our congress, we can work together for the country.
While the Russells showed good judgement in not discussing the case, it would have been wise for the judge to do the same. I find it inappropriate for her to discuss the case with people at the meeting before she has ruled on the case.
how watcher *is* Clara Russel.
In reply to SLT. She most certainly is NOT HOA watcher. You are way out in left field.
What do you mean “She”?
Guess again. I have now been accused of being Jack Cavenah and Clara Russell. I am neither. Guess that means not everyone in Remuda agrees with the board.
[...] Update: Remuda Estates HOA vs Russells Case [...]
[...] Update: Remuda Estates HOA vs Russells Case [...]