Author Archive

The latest update on the Remuda Ranch Estates Association vs Johnnie and Clara Russell lawsuit:

January 5th the Russells were back in court where the Judge overruled the previous court decision, ruling instead in favor of the Russells, which eliminated the bond payment requirement and opened the door for the Russells to appeal the original decision against them in District court.  A court date has not yet been set, but it is anticipated to be done in the next week or two.

Along with this victory, other interesting issues have occurred:

Sign in relation to the Russell's property line

The Russells had their land surveyed and discovered that the sign in question was in fact not placed on their property, but was actually placed about four feet away from their property line – on county land.  The county maintains the land on which the sign was placed, coming out about three times a year to mow or clear brush.  Anyone could have removed the sign at any time, but did not do so.  Due to the fact that the sign was not on the Russell’s property, the charge by the HOA that the Russells have violated a deed restriction should be thrown out.

Less than a week later, Clara Russell was disturbed by her dogs’ barking; looking out a window she realized that Shelby Dougherty (Secretary of the Remuda Ranch Estates HOA) was on her property with a surveying crew, surveying the Russell’s property (even though the Russell’s attorney had provided the court with the results from the survey the Russells had done themselves).  The police were called and Shelby Dougherty was issued a citation for Criminal Trespass and warned that if she ventured onto the Russell’s property again, she would be arrested.

Photo copy of citation issued to Shelby Doughtery by Parker County Sheriff's office.

Shelby Doughtery's Citation for Criminal Trespass

Clara Russell was upbeat when I talked to her today, saying that she expects the Remuda Ranch Estates Association to be forced to drop the case due to the fact that the HOA has run out of money.  In November, the HOA had about $3400 left (out of $54,000 the association received through a gas-drilling lease from Barnett Shell, which the HOA has used for some improvements but also to pay for court costs incurred by the lawsuits the HOA has been involved in).  Since then, there have been several court appearances, which should have eaten the rest of the HOA’s funds.  According to Ms. Russell, each party must have representation in District court – without the money for an attorney, the HOA may be forced to drop the complaint against the Russells.

 

Editor’s note: Shelby’s name has come up in numerous interviews and was quite vocal in a recently released video of a Remuda Ranch Estates HOA board meeting titled, “Bad HOA’s Gone Wild”. You can see her wearing a bluish shirt and glasses nearest to the video camera in the video shown below.

YouTube Preview Image

I have also been provided copies of text messages Mrs. Dougherty allegedly sent HOA resident David Ray regarding another “Wake Up America” sign that the board thought was on his property. The sign happened to be on the gate of the adjacent property which was outside the HOA’s jurisdiction. You can see these threatening text messages in the following photos.

Text sent to HOA resident David Ray by Shelby Dougherty.

Alleged text message sent to David Ray by Shelby Dougherty

Another message sent to HOA resident David Ray by Shelby Dougherty

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

Share

Schools all over Wisconsin have been closed since Tuesday because of illegally striking teachers angry about Governor Walker’s proposals that they contribute to their own pensions and health care and some loss of collective bargaining rights.  Many claim it isn’t about the money, it’s the collective bargaining issue.  They claim that without the ability to collectively bargain Wisconsin’s schools will lose its talented teachers and other top-rated public employees because the benefits they currently enjoy will  be minimized under Walker’s plan.  Because when it comes down to it, it’s really about the kids, right?  Without the great benefits these teachers and other public employees enjoy, a diverse school district like Milwaukee, for example, would experience one of the highest achievement gaps between white and minority students in the country, have a graduation rate of less than 70% for all students, have only 40% of 10th-12th graders proficient in reading and only 30% of 10th-12th graders proficient in math. But wait, this is where the MPS district already stands – with the exceptional benefits the unions are fighting to retain.  So, if the union loses everything they’ve been protesting about for the last week, are they saying that these stats will get worse?

Teacher Protester seen in Madison, Wisconsin

I don't think we want you inspiring our children

Is it really about the kids?  In an article in The Pioneer Press on Saturday, the head of the Hudson, WI Teachers’ Union “acknowledged that the school closures were an inconvenience for parents.” He said he was disappointed the situation “got to a point where individuals felt … this was necessary.”  For districts with a high percentage of students eligible for free/reduced lunches (70% of Milwaukee students are eligible), one has to surmise that many of those students went hungry for the past few days, not to mention the amount of lost work-time as parents struggled to find childcare for kids suddenly out of school for the week.  How many thousands of young children were left home alone when parents gave up trying to find last-minute childcare?  How many parents, struggling without the benefits of multiple sick days (if any), took their own pay cut and chanced losing their jobs to stay home with their kids while the teachers frolicked off to Madison to fight to keep the golden pensions and benefits that are contributing to the bankruptcy of Wisconsin?

It is becoming abundantly clear that (at least for those teachers participating in the illegal strike) the unions in Wisconsin don’t care about the kids they so vehemently use every time they’re asking for an increase in Education spending.  They don’t care about working families – the real working families who rely upon free/reduced breakfast/lunches to feed their kids everyday, the real working families who have no “sick-days”, who live under the mantra: “You don’t work, you don’t get paid.”  The Unions and the Democrats cry and proclaim that they are for the little people, the underdogs, the minorities, the women, and yet when it comes to any loss of money or power, they stand up on top of those little people – stomping them down under their feet and cry “No!”

Is it about the kids in the end?  Or is it about the power the Teachers’ unions stand to lose when schools are changed from “closed shops” to “Right To Work” and those unions can no longer forcibly garnish the wages of the teachers?

Next time a referendum comes around, remember the out-cry over lost power and benefits by the Unions and ask yourself, “Is it really for the kids?”

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

Share
Please Remember to Throw Out that Old Douchebag

Protester with "Throw Out that old Douchebag" sign in Madison, Wisconsin

Monday a friend (who is a Conservative Wisconsin teacher) contacted me to have me look into the budget fixes proposed by Governor Walker.  She and her husband are very upset about the approximate 25% decrease in her paycheck that will result from the increase in pension and medical contributions the Governor is asking the teachers and other public employees to make.  Understandably, she’s struggling to figure out how they’re going to make up for that loss in pay, as are many of the other teachers and public employees who are now protesting the Governor’s budget in Madison.  One of the things cited by my friend as part of her anger is that the Wisconsin Firefighters, Police and State Troopers are exempt from this plan, since those unions endorsed Walker when he ran for governor last year.  She understands the need for the cuts, but feels that if everyone is being asked to make the change, then EVERYONE should be required, not just those who did not endorse the new Governor of Wisconsin.  (My friend is not one of the thousands of teachers who participated in the “sick-in” aka illegal strike this week nor does she condone the teachers who did so or the ones who took students with them to the protest at the Capitol.)

I’ve heard from numerous Wisconsinites regarding this issue.  They’re pretty evenly split between supporting the Governor and supporting the teachers.  I can see and understand both sides of the issue – on the one hand, Wisconsin is looking at a huge budget deficit and trying to fill that hole by requiring additional contributions from the public employees; on the other hand, the public employees, teachers included, have spent the last four or so years, negotiating deals that include no cost of living pay increases in order to keep their pensions and medical benefits intact.  Both sides are passionate about their position and willing to fight for what they believe is right.  If left alone, I have no doubt that eventually the sides would be able to work out their differences.

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere

One of many photos taken at Madison, Wisconsin Protest on 2-17-2011

But now we have President Obama weighing in, calling Governor Walker’s plan “an assault on Unions.”  We have his “Organizing for America” busing people to Madison to join the protests.  The major labor unions have become involved and plan to also join in the protest.  The Democrat Senators are refusing to do their jobs and go to work while thousands besiege the Capitol, many of them students clueless as to why they’re there but excited to be out of school for the day.  The Governor has alerted the National Guard that they may called upon to do essential work if the protesters manage to shut down the government.  What began as a march on the Capitol is erupting into something more and more ominous.  To make things even more interesting, there is now a rally planned for Saturday by various Tea Party groups and Freedom Works in Madison.

The Governor has stated that if the unions do not make the concessions he is requesting, that over 20,000 employees will lose their jobs.  One would think that the public employees would take that threat seriously and re-think their protests.  But there is more than just the required contributions and pay cuts that are driving this uproar.  The Labor Unions, which currently extract dues from all public employees also fear Walker’s plan to eliminate non-salary collective bargaining and tie salary increases to the Consumer Price Index so that public employee salaries would not rise quicker than the rate of inflation and hopefully bring their salaries closer in line with private sector employees as well as allow Wisconsin to become a “Right To Work” state meaning that union membership would become optional, causing the unions to lose millions of dollars of dues every year.

Photo of Protesters in Madison, Wisconsin on 2-17-2011

Photo of protesters seen at Madison, Wisconsin Protest

It is the loss of money and the subsequent loss of power that is the driving force behind the protests.  Where it started as teachers fighting back, the protests have no been hijacked by Big Labor and even our President is feeding the fires with his statements regarding Walker’s plan.  There is no good ending for this protest.

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

Share
Comments (3)

Recently author Amy Chua caused controversy with her book “Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother” and subsequent column in the Wall Street Journal: “Why Chinese Mothers are Superior”.  Much of the backlash stems from Ms. Chua’s statements regarding the treatment of her daughters: calling them “garbage”, not allowing sleepovers or sleep-away camps, etc. and from the arrogant, elitist tone of the column, as when Ms. Chua says:

What Chinese parents understand is that nothing is fun until you’re good at it. To get good at anything you have to work, and children on their own never want to work, which is why it is crucial to override their preferences. This often requires fortitude on the part of the parents because the child will resist; things are always hardest at the beginning, which is where Western parents tend to give up.

Or when she claims:

Chinese parents can order their kids to get straight As. Western parents can only ask their kids to try their best. Chinese parents can say, “You’re lazy. All your classmates are getting ahead of you.” By contrast, Western parents have to struggle with their own conflicted feelings about achievement, and try to persuade themselves that they’re not disappointed about how their kids turned out.

She also claims that instead of studying or doing rote academic drills, Western kids are more likely to be involved in sports.  This might be true, however, Ms. Chua insinuates that being involved in sports is a bad thing and beneath the traditional Chinese families’ values.  Or that being involved in sports somehow is less important than learning to play an instrument perfectly.   In her column, Ms. Chua discusses the Chinese children being forced to practice an instrument for three hours a day, when Western children are only required to practice 30 minutes a day – and the Western mom is exhilarated when her child manages just to do that.

Well, Ms. Chua, your children may be straight-A students, fluent in multiple languages, music-prodigies and accepted into all the top schools in the country, but if they’ve never had to cross the minefield that is a locker room full of 14 and 15 year old boys or deal with the politics that surround a sports’ team try-out process, how do you expect them to know how to effectively use all the book-knowledge you’ve crammed into their brains for the past 18+ years?

As most sports parents understand, raising a child who excels in their sport also requires raising that child to excel in all the other areas of life as well.  It may actually be easier to be a child of Chinese-descent than a Western child – if your mama is forcing you to do your homework and forgo all the extracurriculars available, that Chinese-descended child never has to learn time-management – mom is doing it for him/her.  That child also never has to learn what it is like to rely upon a whole team of individuals to win a game or a meet, never has to feel the disappointment that comes when one gives 100% but his/her teammates do not, nor does that Chinese-parented child ever get to feel the joy that comes when a team takes 3rd place after fighting through a multiple-penalty, 4 on 4 overtime followed by a shoot-out hockey game against a team that’s made it no secret that they’re gunning for each player on the opposing team.

The child of a “Tiger Mom” also never has to deal with the peer pressure and tormenting that can occur in any locker room nor does that child get to develop the life-long friendships that naturally happen during hours spent on the ice, on the court, in a pool or on a field, or the bonding that happens when a team gels so well that each player can almost read his/her teammates’ minds.

Tiger Mom’s children may ace the ACT exam, but what else will they be able to put on a college application?  What happens to Tiger Mom’s children when they finally claw their way out of the den  into the bright light of freedom in college?  If they’ve spent most of their lives being told what to do, when to do it, how long to do something, etc., how will they deal with the challenge of managing their time and learning the social and decision-making skills necessary to navigate a college campus and later deal with office politics?

Ms. Chua throws around statistics from studies comparing Western and Chinese parents, but she doesn’t mention that according to the Department of Health and Human Services, “Asian American women ages 15 to 24 lead in the highest suicide rate amongst all ethnic groups”.  The “whys” behind this high rate of depression and suicide are multiple and mixed, but some have argued that it is from trying to live up to the “Model Minority” stereotype – a stereotype that is essentially exactly the type of parenting model Ms. Chua proclaims as “Superior” to the Western model of parenting.  If the Chinese  Mother parenting model is so superior, why are so many Asian-American girls depressed to the point of suicide?

That American or Western students are falling behind much of the rest of the world academically is indisputable; however, is it parenting methods causing this drop in academic performance or is it the fact that American schools have been straying further and further away from basic education – math, reading, vocabulary, science, etc. – in order t o make room for anti-bullying workshops (which rarely work), sex education and foreign-language immersion programs to name a few?  Is it possible that in the years since the 1960′s Progressive Movement, instead of being rooted in basic education, our school system and children have become pawns for the large and powerful Teachers’ Unions and their never-ending need for more money to feed the pensions of teachers, many of whom have lost any classroom efficacy?

Ms. Chua’s daughters may dominate my kids academically and musically, but the experiences my own kids have had on the ice and in the pool weigh heavier than anything they ever learned from a book.  Those lessons are persistence, competition, tenacity, teamwork, time-management, split-second decision-making and hard work.  No compliment from me can ever fulfill my child more than the feeling of euphoria when all their hard work pays off in that perfect goal or record-setting swim combined with the friendships of the teammates celebrating those achievements beside them.

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

Share

On Thursday, January 27, 2011, Michelle Obama visited Fort Jackson in South Carolina and met with Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling.  The Lt. Gen. has been working to change the Army’s diet and exercise programs in order to improve the fitness our military men and women.  According to news reports, Ms. Obama told the Lt. Gen. that she “was fascinated by the project” and reiterated her oft-repeated statement “that lack of fitness is ‘not just a health issue but a national security issue.’”

First lady: Military could make U.S. fit
FORT JACKSON, S.C. — First lady Michelle Obama said Thursday that the military’s push to turn recruits into health-conscious warriors could be a model for making people across the U.S. more focused on fitness and nutrition.
Obama, who has made battling childhood obesity one of her signature causes as first lady, visited the Army’s largest training post at Fort Jackson outside Columbia to see what the Army has done, from more rigorous training drills to fat-free milk in its mess halls.
She told Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling, who has worked to overhaul both the soldiers’ diets and exercise programs, that she was fascinated by the project.
A lack of fitness is “not just a health issue but a national security issue,” she said.

The St. Paul Pioneer Press, Friday, January 28, 2011, pg. 12A

So, has Michelle Obama now decided that the reforms pushed through by Executive Order and hidden within the Food Safety bill and Healthcare Reform are not enough – that now she must work with the military to enforce those reforms and add to them?  Will the next statement coming from the Office of the First Lady be this: “The State is to care for the elevating national health by . . . the encouragement of physical fitness, by means of the LEGAL establishment of a gymnastic and sport OBLIGATION, by the utmost support of all organizations concerned with the physical instruction of the young.”? How far does the First Lady plan to go?

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

Share

Forbes Magazine‘s has announced that Michelle Obama tops  their 100 Most Powerful Women list:

“At the top of our list, First Lady Michelle Obama is a true change-maker since taking lodge in the White House in 2008. The first African-American in the post, she’s changed the face of the office (literally), and with consistently high approval ratings, she’s given a new generation of girls and women around the world a role model. A former private attorney and public servant in Chicago, her interest in working with young people and advocating for healthy eating, among other issues, is evidenced by her Let’s Move! campaign, which aims to solve the epidemic of childhood obesity within a generation.”

The role as First Lady of the United States doesn’t seem to be sitting well with Ms. Obama who apparently finds the job so difficult that The National Enquirer (which broke the news of John Edwards’ affair two years before the MSM touched the story) is reporting that the day after the First Family returned from vacation at Martha’s Vineyard, Ms. Obama could be heard screaming at her husband:

“Michelle collapsed in tears and even threatened to divorce Barack if he seeks a second term as president,” a source in the nation’s capital told The ENQUIRER.
“At one point, Michelle was heard yelling, ‘I hate you for dragging me through all this…I’ve had enough!’”
Ms. Obama also reportedly told the First Lady of France, Carla Bruni Sarkozy, that she “thinks being First Lady is hell.” This statement has been denied by both parties, but given the report by the National Enquirer, one has to wonder if there isn’t a bit of truth to the denied statement.
To give Michelle credit, being First Lady is hard.  There’s the matter of all those State dinners she has to be dressed for, usually by world-famous designers; the parties PBHO throws for her almost weekly where she has to make small talk with major Hollywood stars and try to appreciate the music played for her by world renown musicians.  Don’t forget, the White House is really big, too, and not having any responsibility for her house, having a personal chef and not having to clean toilets must be a real drag.  Her kids are forced to go to one of the best private schools in the country; she is chauffeured everywhere, and to top it off, the vacations just really suck.  Who would want to take 30+ of their best friends and jet off to Spain on an all-expense (on the backs of the tax-payers) paid trip?  How wretched a life can one have?
Ms. Obama also may feel like she’s not being fully utilized for her brains and experience – meddling with policy and attempting to dictate what Americans can and cannot eat and how much Americans should be exercising seems to not be enough for her; after all she IS Forbes Most Powerful Woman, she should be getting more respect, right?
The reasoning behind Forbes awarding Michelle Obama with the title of  ”Most Powerful Woman in the World” seems a little weak given the competition she had – she beat out perennial ”Most Powerful Woman” woman Oprah (#3), Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton (#5) and Sarah Palin (#16).
So it has to be asked:  Why would Forbes deign to award this title to Michelle?  Instead of the work she is doing on the behalf of the world’s children, could it have more to do with the fact that she holds Obama’s little toy marbles in her hands?  Obama, as President of the  United States, IS the most powerful man in the world, so is Forbes trying to tell America that they know where the real power lies and it ain’t with Barack Hussein Obama?
If that is the case, it can only be hoped that Ms. Obama will continue to wield her power over the Presidential Marbles because who knows:  Perhaps she squeezes so hard that instead of not only not considering a second term, President Obama will give up the Presidency altogether.  (Which, while also making his wife happy, he’d certainly be doing Americans a favor as well.)
Please, Ms. Obama, continue the crying, whining, screaming and threats: the sooner your husband is out of office, the better off America will be.

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

Share