Archive for Constitution
The Threat of Gun Bans Still Lurks Over Us
Posted by: | CommentsThe Supreme Court recently upheld the, Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. That is the Amendment that states, “A well regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state, the right of a free people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. The vote was on a narrow 5 to 4 margin. That is a very narrow margin. All that has to happen to reverse that right is for some President in the future to appoint another justice who votes against the Second Amendment. Could Elana Kagan be that activist Supreme Court Justice who will aide the President in creating law from the bench?
If the Second Amendment is over turned and the freedom to keep and bear arms is abridged then no longer are any of the amendments of the, Bill of Rights, a sure guarantee. Our rights will no longer be given us by, “Nature’s God” or “Creator” as stated in, “The Declaration of Independence”. By man our rights will then be given. So then, by man they can be removed. If you do not believe that is the case, look at the most basic of ALL rights, the right to life. When the Supreme Court voted to allow abortion it threatened the life of all people because life of man is no longer sacred. Now, euthanasia is being discussed in Congress. In the original draft the Health Care Bill was designed to withhold medication that would prolong life for the elderly or what the bill termed as, “terminally ill”. It is a topic now open for discussion in Congress.
If Guns are banned, will that stop murder? What if someone is so full of hate they stab someone who dies as a result of a stab wound, would we then ban knives? If we ban knives and a baseball bat is used to bludgeon someone to death, will bats be banned? In Biblical times they stoned people to death, should we ban rocks or stones? The danger lies, not in the weapon, it lies in the heart of the person who wields the weapon. Since the garden of Eden there have been murders. There will be murders and threats of killings until man no longer abides on this planet.
Tell the people of Arizona that the second amendment is unconstitutional. When the Federal Government will not protect or defend the sovereignty of our borders then it becomes the duty of the state to do so. It also becomes the duty and responsibility of those who live under the threat of illegal immigrants who are violent to have in their possession the means to defend their family and property. It then is the responsibility of every voter to vote out of office ALL those who refuse to live up to the oath they took to, “Preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.”
The greatest threat to our freedoms are the people who govern. If they look at the Constitution as an antiquated document, then we will indeed be in grave danger of losing all freedoms. Recently I was given a copy of the Constitution. On the cover was a disclaimer, “This is an antiquated document.” The Speaker of the House of Representatives, when asked if one of her pet projects would be considered constitutionally stated, “Are you kidding?”. She no longer considers the Constitution important except when it is used to further the agenda of her party. We will either return to a Constitutional government or live under tyranny worse than that of King George. We will then not have our rights removed from us by force, we will have surrendered them for the illusion of security.
2nd Peaceful Armed Open Carry Restore the Constitution Rally to Hit Greensboro NC
Posted by: | CommentsI have just received word in a Press Release that there will be a second “Peaceful” armed open carry rally which will be held in Greensboro, North Carolina on August, 14, 2010.
You may recall a similar peaceful rally that didn’t receive much MSM press earlier this year. On April 19, 2010 a group came together and held a peaceful armed open carry Restore the Constitution rally at Fort Hunt Park in Alexandria, Virginia where they expressed their support for their Second Amendment rights provided by the Constitution while also expressing their serious concerns for the many attacks, by those with a socialist agenda, currently taking place against the Constitution.
This year the event will be held at the Guilford Courthouse Battleground National Park in Greensboro, NC from 1-4 PM on April 14th. The permit has been approved for the event and they are requesting that you follow all state and federal laws and any guidelines the group puts in place. Please take a look at Randy’s Right for a detailed list of these laws.
This year’s speakers are expected to be Mike Vanderboegh, Daniel Almond, Taylor Ruble, John Ainsworth, Ron Woodard, David DeGerolamo, Bubba McDowell, Laura Long, Dr Dan Eichenbaym, Dr BJ Lawson, Rick Smith, Bill Randall, June Griffin, Tom Baugh, Dr Ada Fisher, and Vernon Robertson.
Once again, this will be a peaceful event with law abiding citizens coming together to support their Constitution.
Reflections on the Declaration of Independence and Our Current Circumstances
Posted by: | CommentsReflections on the Declaration of Independence and Our Current Circumstances
It is a habit of mine to revisit those documents so instrumental in the organization and structuring of our country from time to time. I am an enthusiast for the archaic facts of history, as I find that it increases my understanding of how things came to be the way that they presently are. It also enables me to distinguish between the true and the false where ideological appeals are concerned.
What is remarkable to me in my most recent revisiting of the Declaration of Independence is how many parallels can be drawn between that document and the present reality of this country. The litany of complaints in that document reads like a list of objections drawn from the present in the United States.
Let’s take a look at one of those objections. “He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.” Ladies and gentlemen, government regulation costs us nearly $1.2 trillion a year. Our businesses pass these costs on to us in the form of higher prices and lower wages. And it’s only growing as we speak: our tax code alone results in a compliance cost of some $192 billion dollars, and it is currently over 3.5 million words in length, and on an average day, 1.5 new regulations are added to that tax code.
This isn’t confined to Republicans or Democrats. Both parties have participated in the rampant increase in the size, scope, and authority of the federal government over the past 70 years. Both parties have encouraged a growth in the voracious appetite of federal agencies for ever greater amounts of funding, which they then consume for the ostensible purposes of promoting or protecting national interests, which inevitably fall into neglect regardless.
We’ve heard how the Securities and Exchange Commission’s employees possess a proclivity for viewing pornography on the job. Small wonder, then, that our economy imploded not under the weight of regulation and oversight, but rather from the neglectful eye of overseers who were too busy watching people copulate on their computers. Therefore, these same overseers could not be bothered to tear themselves away from the carnal congress unfolding in full glory so that they might, say, investigate the FBI’s warnings of rampant mortgage fraud.
Today we have a Congress and regulatory apparatus doing everything but the one thing that might prevent a future collapse: firing the incompetent, perverted, dilettantes who violated workplace policy and wasted our money and replacing them with competent professionals who might actually investigate charges of fraud. The economic collapse was, as it turns out, entirely foreseeable, but not if your eyes were full of the offerings of Vivid Entertainment or Wicked Pictures. I am no prude. If you must watch pornography, do it on your own time in the privacy of your own home. Do not, however, do it on my dime as an employee of the federal government and expect me to be lenient or understanding when your negligence is at least partially responsible for the collapse of the world economy. The issue is not one of ensuring that banks have higher capital reserves on hand; it is instead one of ensuring that government employees tasked with oversight and enforcement are doing their jobs as opposed to viewing pornography for hours at a time while at work.
We have other reports of the Minerals Management Service employees and their tendency to use crystal meth on the job and view pornography as well. This, according to a US Interior Department report which found such behavior was included, but by no means constituted the entirety of regulatory shortcomings over at that particular agency. In addition to the drugs and the pornography, employees of the Minerals Management Service accepted gifts from the oil companies they were tasked with overseeing, and generously allowed the oil companies to sign off on their own inspections. That is, the employees of the Minerals Management Service never inspected anything. They gave the appropriate documentation to the employees of the oil rig in question, and those employees filled out the inspection sheets. No surprise that the inspection sheets indicated a flawless record in most instances.
We can perhaps understand why it is that the deepwater well operated by BP in the Gulf of Mexico is currently hemorrhaging oil into the water right now. After all, the employees of the department tasked with overseeing its compliance with basic regulatory requirements for safety and operational feasibility were otherwise occupied with pornography and the ingestion of crystal meth. It is also no surprise that several other wells have been capped after a review which found that they possessed multiple design flaws which could have led to similar operational failures.
We pay on the order of $1.2 trillion to comply with federal regulations, and we paid an additional $3.518 trillion in 2009 to get these results. That’s $4.7 trillion, or nearly a third of our GDP. I don’t know how one could credibly argue that we need more spending when the staggering amount of spending we already have has failed to produce a result which works. No amount of spending will wipe out a culture of corruption that is ingrained within our government from the top to the bottom. You can’t give individuals who watch pornography at work and use drugs on the job more money to do their jobs and expect that issues will magically be resolved by your beneficence.
We have enough government spending in this country. In point of fact, we have more than enough spending. What we do not have is a return on our investment, and the reason we do not have it is that we have allowed our government to metastasize to a point where its bureaucrats and employees, who happen to be our employees, do not feel as though they are culpable for their actions. Until that changes, we will continue to have widespread fraud in our markets and ecological catastrophes in our public waters.
I have no objections to unions or unionized workplaces. As a staunch believer in the First Amendment and the right of individuals to associate freely, I have no real issue with workers organizing to get themselves a better deal where matters of compensation are concerned. Do I believe that they should be able to compel everyone who enters employment in a specific workplace to join them? No. Free association goes both ways, and making employment contingent on mandatory membership in a union is a violation of basic individual rights and liberties. I don’t care one whit about the practical implications for unions. Rights are not suspended for purposes of pragmatism, at least not legitimately.
I also do not believe that union membership should keep you from culpability for your actions. If you watch pornography at work, you ought to be fired immediately. If you use drugs on the job, or come to work intoxicated, you ought to be fired immediately. I have no problem with a process being enacted to ensure fairness and ferret out slander from truthful accusations. But in the event that you are found to have engaged in such behavior on the job, especially if you are a taxpayer employee, and government employees are taxpayer employees, you ought to be fired.
We have come to a point in our society where failure is incentivized. Far from suffering rightful culpability, federal employees receive a great deal of leniency and many chances at redemption. Not surprisingly, we have lax enforcement and a record of incompetence and corruption within government bureaucracies. This culture of corruption is widespread. It has stretched into our private sector as well, as the financial sector has come to understand over the past 30 years that if they fail, they will be bailed out and made whole by the federal government. The costs have been high, some $23.7 trillion so far in the case of the TARP bailout.
With each failure, our elected leaders and unelected employees insist that the answer is more. More money. More resources. More power. More offices and departments. The only things they want less of are accountability and oversight of their own performances and results.
In closing, I will leave you with these words, from the Declaration of Independence: …–That to secure these rights (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness), Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just consent from the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundations on such principles and organizing its powers in such form as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” With a government whose direct and indirect cost to the economy consumes nearly a third of our GDP, and a national debt which currently exceeds $13 trillion and which has an additional obligation of $2.5 in IOUs to Social Security, I would say that our government has become destructive to the security of our right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of our own Happiness. It is time to institute a new government, and to re-organize its powers and re-establish its foundations and principles in such a form which shall be most likely to effect our safety and our happiness.
Radical Immigration Reform Rally Takes Place in Atlanta, GA
Posted by: | CommentsIn the midst of the illegal immigration bill passed recently in Arizona, immigrants decided to attend rallies all across the United States (See embedded video). We have all heard all the people speaking for and against the bill. Many of those who have chosen to support the passing of the Arizona bill have actually chosen to read the bill to understand the language within it. While those opposing it choose to just take someone’s word that the bill will give police an open ticket for racial profiling, when the language actually carefully worded in a way to prevent racial profiling from taking place.
Those attending the rally in Atlanta did not choose to say the Pledge of Allegiance, nor did they sing the National Anthem, while the Tea Party Events all across the country did both with great pride.
While I cannot verify this, it is safe to assume that many participants of Tea Party Rally’s were legal citizens of the United States of America. On the other hand, it is fairly safe to say that there were a large number of illegal immigrants attending the Immigration Reform Rally in Atlanta and many other cities across the nation.
While the Tea Party’s have been accused of including mostly white people, which hasn’t always been true. On the other hand the Immigration Reform Rally featured mostly hispanic people. I’m not one to make any claim that either one is racist in any way. In fact, I know the Tea Party events have fought hard to keep racism away from their events. It is my intention to point out the obvious just in case the main stream media chooses to ignore these facts.
It is well worth noting those who were in attendance of the Immigration Rally in Atlanta, Georgia, were busy reading extreme Communist literature flyers which were handed out to participants of the event. It was obviously someone’s intentions to use the event to build real hatred through the use of real propaganda material like the one seen in the video below.
There is no doubt there is a big difference between the two events and the intentions of the event organizers. One group desires to salvage the United States of America and it’s Constitution, while the other group wishes to destroy everything the U.S. has ever stood for. The greatest differences can be seen when comparing videos of Tea Party events and the immigrant protests/riots in Arizona.
The fact is that we are a nation of laws which are clearly spelled out in the Constitution and legislation that has already been passed on the federal level. If we cannot uphold these laws, then what good are we as a lawless nation?
On Power- Part 1 of 3
Posted by: | CommentsThe Power of Persuasion, or the Persuasion of Power?
I use that heading in homage to the resignation of Andy Stern, the head of ACORN’s labor-relations alter-ego, SEIU. He advocated opting for the latter.
We, my friends, must choose one or the other. They cannot both exist simultaneously within a single ideology.
The brushfires of Liberty spoken of so long ago by Samuel Adams have again been kindled in our great nation. The message of Liberty is alive and well, and just as capable of persuading the public in 2010 as it was in 1775. Naturally, believing this, I am vocally supporting using the power of persuasion.
The story I am about to relate comes from very close to my home, but I am not getting into the weeds here. There is a larger (and extremely important) overall point to this, so please bear with me for a few paragraphs.
Here in the 5th Congressional District of Virginia, the revolution has begun, and it is not a pretty sight to behold. I am speaking of a series of elections that are currently taking place to select unit chairs, on the county, large city, and district levels, in the Republican Party.
One such election took place in Campbell County last week, and the sitting Republican chairman was rejected, by a small margin, in favor of fresh blood. The new chairman happens to be aligned with the TeaParty Movement, while the GOP establishment and even the current Virginia Lieutenant Governor endorsed the outgoing chair.
The same exact scenario unfolded in Bedford this past Monday, except that the margin of victory was not even close. The new chairman won 220-105.
This same outcome has, so far, played out in 12 local units. And you can expect encore performances, all across the country, as TeaParty groups become more active on their local political battlefields.
However, the fallout will be just as similar. I witnessed an event Monday night that sent cold chills to my bones. As the new unit chair took to the podium to thank the voters and accept his post, two entire rows of people (about 35, in all), stood up, as a block, and filed out of the auditorium.
Whatever your alignment, TeaParty or party-line, this is an egregious display of bad form.
But it should surprise no one.
The sad fact is this: power does corrupt. And when power is stripped from those who have proven (over and over) that they cannot be trusted with it, they will lash out. Whether it is the controlling party in a governing body, or an unpaid volunteer leading a small local unit, they have gone to great lengths to secure and maintain their modicum of power, and their sphere of influence is jealously guarded.
Just as the local party elites have shown their true colors when faced with their own mortality (in terms of influence), so, too, will the power-brokers inside the 495 beltway jealously guard the power they have amassed, as we the people assert our own authority under the banner of the 10th Amendment. And they will lash out, savagely, at all who oppose.
But we must be prepared for this, and these battles must be waged, for our success or failure there will ultimately predict the outcome of the revolution as a whole.
In short, we must take bold and decisive action to curb the confiscation of our liberty and financial security, but we must recognize that it is the usurpation of our power that has allowed it. And our complacence, by and large, has allowed our power to be taken from us and amassed in a Federal stockpile.
I am an advocate of redistribution, but not in the way our current Federal Feudalists mean it. I believe we need the sort of redistribution that our founders would support: the redistribution of power.
In my next post, I will delve into the strategies that are being used to achieve this goal, and whether they will work. Until then, thanks for reading, and keep up the fight.





